A Closer Look at Access and Equity in Urban Mathematics Education: Revisiting the Recievement Gap
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v17i1a684Keywords:
equity and access, receivement gap, culturally responsive teachingAbstract
This editorial explores the persistent inequities in urban mathematics education, particularly through the lens of the "receivement gap"—a concept introduced by Dr. Terah Venzant Chambers. The receivement gap focuses on disparities in educational inputs and resources provided to marginalized students, challenging the traditional focus on achievement gaps. By examining the systemic barriers that urban students face, including inadequate access to high-quality instruction, resources, and culturally relevant pedagogy, the editorial calls for a shift in focus from outputs to inputs. It proposes strategies to address these inequities, advocating for innovative approaches such as project-based learning, technology integration, and culturally responsive teaching to ensure all students have equal opportunities to succeed in mathematics.
References
Abdulrahim, N. A., & Orosco, M. J. (2020). Culturally responsive mathematics teaching: A research synthesis. The Urban Review, 52(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00509-2
Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. Sage Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Berry III, R. Q., Conway IV, B. M., Lawler, B. R., & Staley, J. W. (2020). High school mathematics lessons to explore, understand, and respond to social injustice. Corwin Press.
Bond, G., & Chernoff, E. J. (2015). Mathematics and social justice: A symbiotic pedagogy.
Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 8(1), 24-30.
Brantlinger, A. (2020). The meritocratic mystique and mathematical mediocrity in hard-to-staff schools: A critique of the best and brightest teacher agenda. Urban Education, 55(7), 1076-1104.
Byrd, P. A., Daughtrey, A., Eckert, J., & Nazareno, L. (2023). Small Shifts, Meaningful Im-provement: Collective Leadership Strategies for Schools and Districts. ASCD.
Capraro, R.M., Capraro, M.C., Barroso, L. R., Young, J. R. (2021). STEM Project-based learn-ing: Integrated Engineering for a New Era. Tx: AggieSTEM. ISBN 9781737719809
Chambers, T. V. (2009a). The “Receivement Gap”: School Tracking Policies and the Fallacy of the “Achievement Gap.” The Journal of Negro Education, 78(4), 417–431. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25676096
Chambers, T. V. (2009b). The" Receivement Gap": School Tracking Policies and the Fallacy of the" Achievement Gap". Journal of Negro Education, 78(4), 417-431.
Che, M., Enderle, K., Nah, J., Jones, L., Young, J., Mitchell, T., ... & Wilkerson, T. (2023, March). Protocol: systematic literature review of the nature of partnership in mathematics education research. In Proceedings for the 50th Annual Meeting of the Research Council on Mathematics Learning. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.rcml-math.org/assets/Proceedings/RCML%202023_Final_Proceedings.pdf
Edosomwan, K., Young, J. L., Butler, B. R., Young, J. R., & Williams III, J. A. (2023). Tracking the Effects: Examining the Opportunity Stratification Hypothesis in Action. Journal of Education, 00220574231168634.
Edosomwan, K., Young, J., Young, J., & Tholen, A. (2022). Mathematics Mobility in the Middle Grades: Tracking the Odds of Completing Calculus. Middle Grades Review, 8(1). https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/ mgreview/vol8/iss1/4
Fergus, E. (2024). Desegregating Ourselves: Challenging the Biases That Perpetuate Inequities in
Our Schools. Corwin Press.
Gorski, P. C. (2017). Reaching and teaching students in poverty: Strategies for erasing the opportunity gap. Teachers College Press.
Jošić, S., Japelj Pavešić, B., Gutvajn, N., Rožman, M. (2022). Scaffolding the Learning in Rural and
Urban Schools: Similarities and Differences. In: Japelj Pavešić, B., Koršňáková, P., Meinck, S. (eds) Dinaric Perspectives on TIMSS 2019. IEA Research for Education, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85802-5_10
King, N. S., Collier, Z., Johnson, B. G., Acosta, M., & Southwell, C. N. (2021). Determinants of
Black families’ access to a community‐based STEM program: A latent class analysis. Science Education, 105(6), 1100-1125.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21669
Kormos, E. (2022). Technology as a Facilitator in the Learning Process in Urban High-Needs
Schools: Challenges and Opportunities. Education and Urban Society, 54(2), 146-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245211004555
Kumar, R. (2023). Challenges and Strategies for Improving Minority Education Access and Success. Sage Science Review of Educational Technology, 6(1), 48–58. Retrieved from https://journals.sagescience.org/index.php/ssret/article/view/59
Lippman, L., Burns, S., & McArthur, E. (1996). Urban schools: The challenge of location and poverty. Diane Publishing.
Males L. M., Sears R., Lawler B. R. (2020). Equity and justice in the preparation of secondary mathematics teachers. In Martin W. G., Lawler B. R., Lischka A. E., Smith W. M. (Eds.), The Mathematics Teacher Education Partnership: The power of a networked improvement community to transform mathematics teacher preparation (pp. 57–90). Information Age.
Moldavan, A. M. (2020). Advancing conversations of equity and inclusion in mathematics teacher education. New York Academy of Public Education Research Journal, 9(1), 20-26. https://nyape.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/NYAPE-research-journal-2020.pdf#page=26
Miller C. C., Quealy K. (2018, June 13). Where boys outperform girls in math: Rich, White and suburban districts. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/06/13/upshot/boys-girls-math-reading-tests.html
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Mathematics Performance. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved [date], from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cnc.
Oakes, J., Cookson, P., George, J., Levin, S., & Carver-Thomas, D. (2021). Adequate and Equi-table Education in High-Poverty Schools: Barriers and Opportunities in North Carolina. Research Brief. Learning Policy Institute.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2018). Equity in education: Breaking down barriers to social mobility. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264073234-en
Rist, R. C. (2017). The urban school: A factory for failure. Routledge.
Sasson, I., Yehuda, I., & Malkinson, N. (2018). Fostering the skills of critical thinking and questioning-posing in a project-based learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.08.001
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2022). Why are learning and teaching mathematics so difficult? In M. Danesi (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive mathematics (pp. 1–35). Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_10-1%23DOI.
Thomas, C. A., & Berry III, R. Q. (2019). A qualitative metasynthesis of culturally relevant ped-agogy & culturally responsive teaching: Unpacking mathematics teaching practices. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 10(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.7916/jmetc.v10i1.1668
Young, J. (2017). Technology-enhanced mathematics instruction: A second-order meta-analysis of 30 years of research. Educational Research Review, 22, 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.07.001
Young, J. R., Tholen, A., Ortiz, N. A., Harmon, W. C., James, M. C. (2022). Recruiting teachers of
color in STEM for high need schools: Lesson learned from the Robert Noyce teacher scholarship program. In T. J. Bristol & C. Gist (Eds.), The handbook of research on teachers of color: Official handbook of the American Education Research Association (pp. 145-156) American Educational Research Association.
Young, J., & Young, J. (2023). Before We Let Go!: Operationalizing Culturally Informed Education. Multicultural Perspectives, 25(2), 96-111. • https://doi.org/10.1080/15210960.2023.2212719
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jamaal Young, Jemimah Young
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright for articles in JUME is held by the individual. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use with proper attribution in educational and other non-commercial settings.
How to Cite
