Entangling and Disentangling Inquiry and Equity: Voices of Mathematics Education and Mathematics Professors
Keywords:inquiry-oriented instruction, equity, teacher education, co-writing
Professors of mathematics and mathematics education engage in inquiry, and, as teachers of mathematics, they engage their students in inquiry. How could this work be more equity-minded? After participating in inquiry during a summer institute, 24 mathematics education professors and mathematics professors shared their voices during two interviews about how equity and inquiry intertwine. These participants engaged in a co-writing process to equitably inquire together for this paper. Findings are presented in a framework of relationships between inquiry and equity, which extend the previous work of Tang and colleagues (2017), illustrating that (a) equity opportunities and dilemmas are always present during inquiry, (b) we can see equity (or in-equity) in inquiry (occurring during the process of engaging in inquiry), and (b) some participants conducted inquiry for equity (the propose of inquiry was to work toward greater equity). Contributions of this paper include a framework for how equity and inquiry intertwine, for both teaching and collaborative scholarship, and an illustration of equitable inquiry in practice, through co-writing. Implications of this study include a greater awareness of considerations for being equity-minded when facilitating inquiry-oriented instruction or when mathematics education professors and mathematics professors collaborate in their scholarly inquiry.
Aguirre, J., Mayfield-Ingram, K., & Martin, D. (2013). The impact of identity in K–8 mathematics learning and teaching: Rethinking equity-
based practices. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators (2015). Equity in mathematics teacher education: A position paper of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. https://amte.net/sites/default/files/amte_equitypositionstatement_sept2015.pdf
Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematical worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 45–82). Ablex.
Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The art of problem posing. Psychology Press.
Bryant, S., Eubanks-Turner, C., Moore, C., Reznikoff, S., & Yu, J. (2018) Equity in mathematics education: Five mathematicians reflect on the 2018 PCMI workshop. MAA Focus, 38(6), 16–18. http://digitaleditions.walsworthprintgroup.com/publication/?m=7656&i=546728&p=18
Cerezo, N. (2004). Problem-based learning in the middle school: A research case study of the perceptions of at-risk females. RMLE Online, 27(1), 1-13.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2020). Measurement as relational, intensive and analogical: Towards a minor mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 59, 100796
Featherstone, H., Crespo, S., Jilk, L. M., Oslund, J. A., Parks, A. N., and Wood, M. B. (2011). Smarter together! Collaboration and equity in the elementary math classroom. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Felton-Koestler, M. D. (2020). Teaching sociopolitical issues in mathematics teacher preparation: What do mathematics teacher educators need to know? The Mathematics Enthusiast, 17(2), 435–468.
Foote, M. Q., & Bartell, T. G. (2011). Pathways to equity in mathematics education: How life experiences impact researcher positionality. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(1), 45–68.
Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Reidel.
Goldin, G. A. (1990). Chapter 3: Epistemology, constructivism, and discovery learning in mathematics. In Journal for research in mathematics education. Monograph, Vol. 4, constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 31–47, 195–210).
Gonick, M., & Hladki, J. (2005). Who are the participants? Rethinking representational practices and writing with heterotopic possibility in qualitative inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 285–304.
Gravemeijer, K., Cobb, P., Bowers, J., & Whitenack, J. (2000). Symbolizing, modeling, and instructional design. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K.
McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 225–273). Erlbaum.
Gutstein, E. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics for social justice in an urban, Latino school. Journal for Research in Mathematics education, 34(1), 37–73.
Gutstein, E., Fey, J. T., Heid, M. K., DeLoach-Johnson, I., Middleton, J. A., Larson, M., Dougherty, B., & Tunis, H. (2005). Equity in school mathematics education: How can research contribute?: NCTM Research Committee. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 92–100.
Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Toward a new equity research agenda. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2-3), 145-187.
Gutiérrez, R. (2008). Research commentary: A gap-gazing fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 357–364.
Gutiérrez, R. (2012). Context matters: How should we conceptualize equity in mathematics education? In B. Herbel-Eisenmann, J. Choppin, D. Wager, & D. Pimm (Eds.), Equity in discourse for mathematics education (pp. 17–33). Springer.
Gutiérrez, R. (2013). Why (urban) mathematics teachers need political knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(2), 7–19.
Gutiérrez, R. (2017). Political conocimiento for teaching mathematics: Why teachers need it and how to develop it. In Kastberg, S. E.,
Tyminski, A. M., Lischka, A. E., & Sanchez, W. B. (Eds.), Building support for scholarly practice in mathematics methods (pp. 11–37). Information Age.
Harding, N. A. (2020). Co-constructing feminist research: Ensuring meaningful participation while researching the experiences of criminalised women. Methodological Innovations, 13(2).
Heron, J. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. Sage.
Jansen, A., & Center for Inquiry and Equity in Mathematics. (2021). Entangling and disentangling inquiry and equity: Voices of mathematics education and mathematics professors. In D. Olanoff, K. Johnson, & S. M. Spitzer (Eds). Proceedings of the forty-third annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (p. 222).
Johnson, E., Andrews-Larson, C., Keene, K., Melhuish, K., Keller, R., & Fortune, N. (2020). Inquiry and gender inequity in the undergraduate mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(4), 504–516.
Kuster, G., Johnson, E., Keene, K., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2018) Inquiry-oriented instruction: A conceptualization of the instructional principles, PRIMUS, 28(1), 13–30
Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.
Larnell, G. V., & Bullock, E. C. (2018). A socio-spatial framework for urban mathematics education: Considering equity, social justice, and the spatial turn. In T. G. Bartell (Ed.), Toward equity and social justice in mathematics education (pp. 43–57). Springer.
Larnell, G. V., & Martin, D. B. (2021). Urban mathematics education as a political and personal project. In Handbook of urban education (2nd ed., pp. 355–368). Routledge.
Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis, and interpretation (Vol. 47). Sage.
Lubienski, S. T. (2000). Problem solving as a means toward mathematics for all: An exploratory look through a class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 454–482.
Manning, S. M. (2018). Collaborative poetic processes: Methodological reflections on co-writing with participants. The Qualitative Report, 23(4), 742–757.
Martin, D. B. (2006). Mathematics learning and participation as racialized forms of experience: African American parents speak on the struggle for mathematics literacy. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(3), 197–229.
Martin, D. B., Gholson, M. L., & Leonard, J. (2010). Mathematics as gatekeeper: Power and privilege in the production of knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(2), 12–24.
McLeman, L., & Vomvoridi-Ivanovic, E. (2012). Understanding the practices of mathematics teacher educators who focus on issues of equity. REDIMAT: Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(3), 278–300.
Melville, W., Bartley, A., & Fazio, X. (2013). Scaffolding the inquiry continuum and the constitution of identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1255–1273.
Mintos, A., Hoffman, A. J., Kersey, E., Newton, J., & Smith, D. (2019). Learning about issues of equity in secondary mathematics teacher education programs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(5), 433–458.
Mueller, M. F., & Maher, C. A. (2010). Promoting equity through reasoning. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(9), 540–547.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(1), 5–23.
Popkewitz, T. (2004). The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: Inscriptions and the fabrication of the child. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 3–34.
Rasmussen, C., & Kwon, O. K. (2007). An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 189–194.
Reinholz, D., Johnson, E., Andrews-Larson, C., Stone-Johnstone, A., Smith, J., Mullins, B., Fortune, N., Keene, K. & Shah, N. (2022). When active learning is inequitable: Women’s participation predicts gender inequities in mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(3), 204–226.
Roh, K. H. (2003). Problem-based learning in mathematics. ERIC Clearinghouse.
Rubel, L. H. (2017). Equity-directed instructional practices: Beyond the dominant perspective. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 10(2).
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.
Shah, N., Cosby, M. D., Goffney, I. M., Kalenic-Craig, C., Wood, M. B., Hand, V., & Crespo, S. (2022). “Bossy,” “boy,” and “urban”: Troubling coded language in mathematics education research. In J.M. Langer-Osuna & N. Shah (Eds.), Making visible the invisible: The promise and challenges of identity research in mathematics education. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Short, M. (2018). The co-operative inquiry research method: A personal story. In M. Pawar, W. Bowles, & K. Bell (Eds.), Social work: Innovations and insights (pp. 232–244). Australian Scholarly.
Short, M., & Healy, J. P. (2016). Writing ‘with’ not ‘about’: Examples in co-operative inquiry. In S. Gair & A. V. Luyn (Eds.), Sharing qualitative research: Showing lived experience and community narratives (pp. 188–203). Routledge.
Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.
Siry, C. A., & Zawatski, E. (2011) ‘Working with’ as a methodological stance: Collaborating with students in teaching, writing, and research, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(3), 343–361.
Staples, M. (2007). Supporting whole-class collaborative inquiry in a secondary mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2–3), 161–217.
Suazo-Flores, E., Stoehr, K., & Fernandes, A. (2020, winter). Mathematics teacher educators’ conceptualizations of equity. Connections. https://amte.net/connections/2020/11/mathematics-teacher-educators%E2%80%99-conceptualizations-equity
Tang, G., El Turkey, H., Cilli-Turner, E., Savic, M., Karakok, G., & Plaxco, D. (2017). Inquiry as an entry point to equity in the classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(Suppl. 1), S4–S15.
Vomvoridi-Ivanovic, E., & McLeman, L. (2015). Mathematics teacher educators focusing on equity: Potential challenges and resolutions. Teacher Education Quarterly, 42(4), 83–100.
Copyright (c) 2023 Amanda Jansen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright for articles in JUME is held by the individual. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use with proper attribution in educational and other non-commercial settings.