The Role of Technology in Enhancing Urban Mathematics Education

Jamaal Rashad Young

doi:10.21423/jume-v16i2a589

Authors

Jamaal Rashad Young Texas A&M University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v16i2a589

Keywords:

Urban Mathematics Education , Technology Integration, Inclusivity in Learning Equitable Access, AI, Game-based Learning

Abstract

The integration of technology in urban mathematics education has emerged as a promising approach to address educational disparities and foster engaging learning environments. With the widespread availability of technology infrastructure in urban schools, there is a growing focus on leveraging digital tools and resources to enhance mathematics learning outcomes. This editorial examines the impact of technology on urban mathematics education, exploring its potential to bridge opportunity gaps and promote inclusivity. Drawing on current research and best practices, we highlight the benefits and challenges of technology integration, emphasizing the importance of equitable access, teacher professional development, and tailored instructional approaches. The editorial underscores the need for collaborative efforts among stakeholders to advocate for increased funding and support for technology initiatives in urban schools. By embracing innovative practices such as educational apps, virtual reality, and online collaborative projects, educators can create dynamic learning environments that empower students to excel in mathematics. The ongoing dialogue and efforts surrounding the role of technology in urban mathematics education are critical for achieving educational equity and excellence for all students. As technology continues to evolve, it remains imperative for educators and policymakers to prioritize effective technology integration strategies that cater to the diverse needs of urban learners.

Author Biography

Jamaal Rashad Young, Texas A&M University

Jamaal Young, Ph.D., focuses his attention on preparing pre-service teachers to meet the needs of all their students. His particular research interest is the uses of education technologies to develop teacher's knowledge of mathematics. Other emphases in his work are culturally responsive STEM education and mathematics achievement of children of color. His doctorate from Texas A&M University is in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in mathematics education. He joined the UNT faculty as an assistant professor in 2011. Jamaal's research interests include: (a) Technology integration and utilization in mathematics classrooms, (b) Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for mathematics teachers, and (c) Culturally Relevant Pedagogy for STEM education.

References

Anderson, C. R., & Tate, W. F. (2015). Toward a sociology of mathematics education: Examin-ing

democratic access in US schools. In Handbook of international research in mathematics ed-ucation (pp. 386-406). Routledge.

Anthony, A. B., & Clark, L. M. (2011). Examining dilemmas of practice associated with the

integration of technology into mathematics classrooms serving urban students. Urban Edu-cation, 46(6), 1300-1331. DOI: 10.1177/0042085911416015

Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2022). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended

learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 719-740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00420-0

Bauer, J. & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward Technology Integration in the Schools: Why It Isn’t

Happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519-546. Norfolk, VA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved June 23, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/4728/.

Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usa-ble

innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational psychologist, 35(3), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3503_1

Chambers, T.V. (2009). The "Receivement Gap": School Tracking Policies and the Fallacy of the

"Achievement Gap". Journal of Negro Education 78(4), 417-431. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/807007.

Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications

For enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 9, 88-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.001

Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital

revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.

Corkin, D., Ekmekci, A., White, C., & Fisher, A. (2016). Teachers’ self-efficacy and knowledge

for the integration of technology in mathematics instruction at urban schools. Shining a Light on Mathematics Learning. https://www.rcml-math.org/assets/Proceedings/rcml_proceedings--2016.pdf#page=107

De Vita, M., Verschaffel, L., & Elen, J. (2014). Interactive whiteboards in mathematics teaching:

A literature review. Education Research International, 2014, 1-16. doi:10.1155/2014/919704

Epper, R. M., & Baker, E. D. (2009). Technology solutions for developmental math: An

overview of current and emerging practices. Journal of Developmental Education, 26(2), 4-23. doi:10.1353/jde.0.0045

FAO. (2021). E-learning methodologies and good practices: A guide for designing and delivering

e-learning solutions from the FAO elearning Academy, second edition. Rome.

https://doi.org/10.4060/i2516e

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital

technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3(1), 11-21. doi:10.1108/SOC-12-2021-0101

Harvey-Buschel, P. (2009). A quantitative examination of factors that impact technology

integration in urban public secondary mathematics classrooms. Bowie State University.

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology

Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5

Hoyles, C. (2018). Transforming the mathematical practices of learners and teachers through

digital technology. Research in Mathematics Education, 20(3), 209-228.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2018.1465506

Huang, R. (2019). Educational technology: A primer for the 21st century. Springer Nature

Singapore Pte Ltd.

Jensen, E. O., & Skott, C. K. (2022). How can the use of digital games in mathematics education

promote students’ mathematical reasoning? A qualitative systematic review. Digital Expe-riences in Mathematics Education, 8(2), 183-212. doi:10.1007/s40751-021-00213-9

Johnson, E. K., & Salter, A. (2022). Playful Pedagogy in the Pandemic: Pivoting to Game-Based

Learning. Taylor & Francis.

Kaddoura, S., & Al Husseiny, F. (2023). The rising trend of Metaverse in education: Challenges,

opportunities, and ethical considerations. PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1252. doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1252

Kaput, J., Hegedus, S., & Lesh, R. (2020). Technology becoming infrastructural in mathematics

education. In Foundations for the future in mathematics education (pp. 173-191). Routledge.

Keengwe, J. & Akyeampong, A. (2010). Technology Integration Barriers in K-12 Urban

Classrooms. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010--Society for In-formation Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2267-2271). San Diego, CA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 23, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/33702/.

Kimble, T. (2020). The impact of gamification on the mathematics achievement of elementary

students.

King, J., & South, J. (2017). Reimagining the role of technology in higher education: A

supplement to the national education technology plan. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology.

Kormos, E. M. (2018). The unseen digital divide: Urban, suburban, and rural teacher use and

perceptions of web-based classroom technologies. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2018.1429168

Kormos, E. (2022). Technology as a facilitator in the learning process in urban high-needs schools:

Challenges and opportunities. Education and Urban Society, 54(2), 146-163. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00131245211004555?casa_token=oSddYfrCfBYAAAAA:IBVQVRfwGBFW4ze3Lxxf0N6zpDM4b2pebAPEvNMdZrRnNY67SRGj_uPoSTZB9OyKFHcb3tRq-PbX

Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology

into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575-614. doi:10.3102/00346543030575575

Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school

students' mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215-243. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8

Meyer, M., Zosh, J. M., McLaren, C., Robb, M., McCafferty, H., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek,

K., & Radesky, J. (2021). How educational are 'educational' apps for young children? App store content analysis using the Four Pillars of Learning framework. Journal of Children and Media, 15(4), 526–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1882516

Moreno-Armella, L., & Santos-Trigo, M. (2015). The use of digital technology in mathematical

practices: Reconciling traditional and emerging approaches. In K. Beswick, T. Muir, & J. Wells (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 607-628). Routledge.

Moeller, B., & Reitzes, T. (2011). Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC): Integrating

Technology with Student-Centered Learning. Quincy, MA: Nellie Mae Education Founda-tion.

Muntean, C. H., Bogusevschi, D., & Muntean, G. M. (2019). Innovative technology-based

solutions for primary, secondary and tertiary STEM education. Paragon Publishing.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Technology and education. Retrieved from

https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cmr.asp

Nolan, J., & McBride, M. (2014). Beyond gamification: Reconceptualizing game-based learning in early

childhood environments. Information, Communication & Society, 17(5), 594-608. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.808365

Nousiainen, T., Kangas, M., Rikala, J., & Vesisenaho, M. (2018). Teacher competencies in game-based

pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 85-97. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.009

Padrón, Y. N., Waxman, H. C., Lee, Y. H., Lin, M. F., & Michko, G. M. (2012). Classroom Observations of Teaching and Learning with Technology in Urban Elementary School Mathematics Classrooms Serving English Language Learners. International Journal of In-structional Media, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2012.10524223

Panconesi, G., & Guida, M. (Eds.). (2021). Handbook of Research on Teaching With Virtual Environments

and AI. IGI Global.

Ringstaff, C., & Kelley, L. (2002). The learning return on our educational technology investment: A review

of findings from research. Educational Technology Review, 10(1), 67-74. doi:10.1080/10474410208903538

Rizk, J., & Davies, S. (2021). Can digital technology bridge the classroom engagement gap? Findings

from a qualitative study of k-8 classrooms in 10 Ontario school boards. Social Sciences, 10(1), 12. doi:10.3390/socsci10010012

Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Chang-ing how and

what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The future of children, 76-101.

https://doi.org/10.2307/1602694

Rubel, L. H. (2017). Equity-directed instructional practices: Beyond the dominant perspective. Journal of

Urban Mathematics Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v10i2a324

Scharaldi, K. (2020). What are the benefits of teaching math using technology. Education Con-sultant.

Shuler, C., Winters, N., & West, M. (2013). The future of mobile learning: Implications for poli-cy makers

and planners. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), 7-35.

Tan, E., Barton, A. C., Turner, E., & Gutiérrez, M. V. (2012). Empowering science and mathe-matics

education in urban schools. University of Chicago Press.

Tate, W. (2001). Science education as a civil right: Urban schools and opportunity‐to‐learn con-siderations.

Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 1015-1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200111)38:9<1015::AID-TEA1012>3.0.CO;2-K

Tate, W. F., Anderson, C. R., & Tate, D. A. (2021). SUM it up: A sociological approach to ur-ban

mathematics education. In Handbook of urban education (pp. 369-383). Routledge.

Wachira, P., & Keengwe, J. (2011). Technology integration barriers: Urban school mathematics teachers perspectives. Journal of science education and technology, 20, 17-25.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9230-y

Xiao, Y., Li, Y., Young, J. R., & Wang, K. (2023). Effects of the iPad use on K-12 students' STEM achievement: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Or-ganisation, 17(4), 537-556. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1504/ijmlo.2023.133779

Young, J. R. (2017). Technology integration in mathematics education: Examining the quality of meta-

analytic research. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(1), 71-86.

Young, J., Gorumek, F., & Hamilton, C. (2018). Technology effectiveness in the mathematics classroom: A systematic review of meta-analytic research. Journal of Computers in Educa-tion, 5(2), 133-148.

Young, J., Hamilton, C., & Cason, M. (2017). Interactive whiteboards in mathematics spaces: An

examination of technology integration in an urban middle school. Contemporary Educa-tional Technology, 8(4), 303-318. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/354042

Young, J. R., Ortiz, N., & Young, J. L. (2017). STEMulating interest: A meta-analysis of the effects of out-of-school time on student STEM interest. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 62-74. https://www.ijemst.org/index.php/ijemst/article/view/109

Young, J. & Young, J. (2013). STEMulations: Purposefully Repurposing PowerPoint Technolo-gy

for Socially Situated Simulations. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Con-ference (p. 2979). New Orleans, Louisiana, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 24, 2023 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/48546/.

Young, J. R., & Young, J. L. (2012). But that’s not fair”: Teacher technology readiness and

African American Students’. The Journal of the Texas Alliance of Black School Educa-tors, 4(1), 19-32.

Young, J. R., Young, J. L., & Hamilton, C. (2013). The use of confidence intervals as a meta-

analytic lens to summarize the effects of teacher education technology courses on preservice teacher TPACK. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 149-172.

Young, J. R., Young, J., Hamilton, C., & Pratt, S. S. (2019). Evaluating the effects of profes-sional

development on urban mathematics teachers TPACK using confidence inter-vals. REDIMAT, 8(3),

-338. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7323808

Zhan, Z., Tong, Y., Lan, X., & Zhong, B. (2022). A systematic literature review of game-based

learning in Artificial Intelligence education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-22. doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2058513