Using Large-Scale Datasets to Amplify Equitable Learning in Urban Mathematics
Keywords:large-scale data, methodology, NCES
Our purpose in this article was to provide researchers using NCES datasets to analyze secondary students’ mathematics achievement in urban schools with methodological considerations and analytical suggestions. We are hopeful that researchers interested in students’ mathematics achievement in urban schools will consider accessing and using NCES studies to deepen our collective understanding beyond IES summary statistics featured in reports such as NAEP and TIMMS and tables from The Condition of Education. We believe that studies of large-scale data that are attentive to the methodological considerations of complex sampling, data clustering and causal inference, will contribute nuanced perspectives of promising policy and practice directions for improving disparities in urban secondary school students’ inequitable mathematics achievement outcomes.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (US). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological test-ing. American Educational Research Association.
Capraro, M. M., Capraro, R. M. & Lewis, C. W. (2013). Improving urban schools: Equity and access in K–12 STEM education. Information Age Publishing.
Carpenter, T. P., Lindquist, M. M., Matthews, W., & Silver, E. A. (1983). Results of the third NAEP mathematics assessment: Secondary school. The Mathematics Teacher, 76(9), 652–659.
Celedón-Pattichis, S. (2008). “What does that mean?”: Drawing on Latino and Latina students’ language and culture to make mathematical meaning. In M. W. Ellis (Ed.), Mathematics for every student: Responding to diversity, Grades 6–8 (pp. 59–73). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
de Brey, C., Musu, L., McFarland, J., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., Diliberti, M., Zhang, A., Branstetter, C., & Wang, X. (2019). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups 2018 (NCES 2019-038). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019038.pdf
Gándara, P., & Orfield, G. (2010). A return to the ‘Mexican room’: The segregation of Arizona’s English learners. The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at UCLA. https://www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/language-minority-students/a-return-to-the-mexican-room-the-segregation-of-arizonas-english-learners-1/gandara-return-mexican-room-2010.pdf
Gifford B., & Valdés, G. (2006). The linguistic isolation of Hispanic students in California’s public schools: The challenge of reintegration. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 105(2), 125–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7984.2006.00079.x
Gutiérrez, R. (2007). (Re)defining equity: The importance of a critical perspective. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 37–50). Teachers College Press.
Ingels, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Herget, D. R., Burns, L. J., Dever, J. A., Ottem, R., Rogers, J. E., Jin, Y., & Leinwand, S. (2011). High School Longitudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09): Base-year data file documentation (NCES 2011-328). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Center for Education Statistics, Elementary/Secondary & Libraries Studies Division. https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/hsls09/pdf/2011328_1.pdf
Ingels, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Rogers, J. E., Siegel, P. H., & Stutts, E. S. (2004). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: Base year data file user’s manual (NCES 2004-405). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004405.pdf
Johnson, R. S. (2002). Using data to close the achievement gap: How to measure equity in schools. Corwin Press.
Kao, G., & Tienda, M. (1995). Optimism and achievement: The educational performance of immigrant youth. Social Science Quarterly, 76(1), 1–19.
Lippman, L., Burns, S., & McArthur, E. (1996). Urban schools: The challenge of location and poverty (NCES 96-184). U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics, Data Development and Longitudinal Studies Group. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs/96184all.pdf
Maldonado, S. I., Mosqueda, E., & Bravo. M. A. (under review). Mathematical proficiency practices as predictor of Latinxs’ standardized test scores: A simultaneous analysis of student, teacher and school factors.
Martin, D. B., Gholson, M. L., & Leonard, J. (2010). Mathematics as gatekeeper: Power and privilege in the production of knowledge. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(2), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v3i2a95
Martiniello, M. (2008). Language and the performance of English language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78(2), 333–368. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.2.70783570r1111t32
McFarland, J., Hussar, B., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Wang, K., Hein, S., Diliberti, M., Cataldi, E. F., Mann, F. B., & Barmer, A. (2019). The condition of education 2019 (NCES 2019-144). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019144
Milner, H. R. (2012). But what is urban education? Urban Education, 47(3), 556–561. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0042085912447516
Moses, R. P., Cobb, C. E., Jr. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Beacon Press.
Mosqueda, E. (2010). Compounding inequalities: English proficiency and tracking and their relation to mathematics performance among Latina/o secondary school youth. Journal of Ur-ban Mathematics Education, 3(1), pp. 57–81. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v3i1a47
Mosqueda, E. (2011). Teacher quality, academic tracking and the mathematics performance of Latino ELs. In K. Téllez, J. N. Moschkovich, & M. Civil (Eds.), Latinos and mathematics education: Research on learning and teaching in classrooms and communities (pp. 315–339). Information Age Publishing.
Mosqueda, E., & Maldonado, S. I. (2013). The effects of English language proficiency and curricular pathways: Latina/os' mathematics achievement in secondary schools. Equity & Excellence in Education 46(2), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2013.780647
Mosqueda, E., Maldonado, S. I., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (under review). Systematized discrimination: The relationship between students’ linguistic minority status, race-ethnicity, opportunities to learn, and college preparatory mathematics.
Murnane, R. J., & Willet, J. B. (2011). Methods Matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. Oxford University Press.
Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. In P. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 267–316). American Sociological Association.
Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2007). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4xr8z4wb
Perry, T., Steele, C., & Hilliard, A., II (2003). Young, gifted and Black: Promoting high achievement among African American students. Beacon Press.
Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. G. (2001). Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. University of California Press; Russell Sage Foundation.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. (2nd ed.). Sage.
Rosenbaum P. R., & Rubin D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 516–524.
Rubin, D. B. (1997). Estimating causal effects from large datasets using propensity scores. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(8, Part 2), 757–763. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_part_2-199710151-00064
Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of social composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107, 1999–2045. https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=12152
Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W. H., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs [White paper]. American Educational Research Association. https://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/Causal%20Effects.pdf
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press.
Stevens, F. I., & Grymes, J. (1993). Opportunity to learn (OTL): Issues of equity for poor and minority students (ED356306). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED356306.pdf
Tate, W. (2001). Science education as a civil right: Urban schools and opportunity-to-learn considerations. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 1015–1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1045
Thomas, S. L., & Heck, R.H. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 517–540. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011098109834
Thomas, S. L., Heck, R. H., & Bauer, K.W. (2005). Weighting and adjusting for design effects in secondary data analyses. New Directions for Institutional Research, 127, 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.155
Trujillo, T. (2016). Restoring the federal commitment to equal educational opportunity: New directions for ESSA’s school improvement initiatives. Education Law & Policy Review, 3, 141–165. https://educationlaw.org/images/pdf/2016/elpr vol 3.pdf
Turner, E. E., & Celedón-Pattichis, S. (2011). Mathematical problem-solving among Latina/o kindergartners: An analysis of opportunities to learn. Journal of Latinos and Education, 10(2), 146–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2011.556524
Welsh, R. O., & Swain, W. A. (2020). (Re)Defining urban education: A conceptual review and empirical exploration of the definition of urban education. Educational Researcher, 49(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X20902822
Whitehurst, G. J. (2003). The institute of education sciences: New wine, new bottles (ED478983). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED478983.pdf
How to Cite
The copyright for articles in JUME is held by the individual. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use with proper attribution in educational and other non-commercial settings.